BEMO:2000019 · BEMO metric v1.0.0

Pathway-Level Support

The magnitude and credibility of independent evidence supporting pathway-level.

CandidateRubricRequiredContextSpecificProtocolRequired
Scientific pillar
Biological Mechanism and Experimental Evidence
Source category
Biological Plausibility and Mechanism
Output scale
OrdinalOrNormalizedScoreScale
Source maturity
Established

Scientific meaning

What it measures

Assesses pathway-level support using evidence appropriate to biological plausibility and mechanism, distinguishing random uncertainty from systematic error.

Why it matters

Material weakness in pathway-level support can change the direction, magnitude, certainty, or biological interpretation of the research conclusion.

Measurement criteria

Prespecified operational definition; appropriate comparator or reference; quantified uncertainty; independent or orthogonal corroboration; sensitivity analyses.

Typical methods of assessment

Structured critical appraisal; quantitative estimation with uncertainty; prespecified thresholds; independent replication; sensitivity and subgroup analyses.

Computation profile

Apply a versioned, prespecified domain rubric or validated normalized scoring model.
Computation mode
RuleBasedRubricComputation
Readiness
RubricRequired
Formula status
ContextSpecificProtocolRequired
Method family
structured critical appraisal or rubric scoring
Output datatype
xsd:string_or_decimal
Unit or scale
Ordinal rubric, domain judgment, or normalized score
Numeric range
Context dependent
Directionality
ContextDependentDirection

Required inputs

  • evidence_records
  • assessment_context
  • rubric_version
  • operational_definition

Optional inputs

  • weights
  • thresholds
  • expert_adjudication

Machine-readable expression

{
  "language": "BEMO-Expression-JSON",
  "operator": "external_protocol",
  "protocolRef": "REQUIRED",
  "allowed_outputs": [
    "ordinal_category",
    "normalized_score"
  ]
}

Computation policies

Aggregation
Not specified in source; must be defined and versioned before composite use.
Normalization
None by default; any normalization must be justified, versioned, and validated.
Missing data
Must be declared before computation; report missingness; no silent imputation; perform sensitivity analysis when material.
Uncertainty required
Yes
Uncertainty method
Confidence interval, credible interval, bootstrap distribution, inter-rater reliability, or sensitivity analysis as scientifically applicable.
Confidence interval required
No
Threshold policy
Prespecify, justify, version, and sensitivity-test thresholds; do not derive and evaluate on the same data without correction.
Decision thresholds
No universal threshold declared
Quality control
Source provenance; input validation; duplicate control; uncertainty reporting; independent or orthogonal validation where applicable.
Calibration
Required for normalized scores; inter-rater reliability required for human rubrics.

Applicability and validation

Evidence object
Result / experiment / study / body of evidence, as applicable
Evidence level
Result / experiment / study / body of evidence, as applicable
Study types
Molecular, cellular, animal, translational, pharmacologic, and human studies
Domain
Biological Plausibility and Mechanism
Required data sources
Context-specific; use source references, registered studies, primary data, and authoritative biomedical resources as applicable.
Validation status
Source maturity: Established; BEMO computation profile requires independent validation.
Benchmark
A representative, versioned benchmark set is required before production use.
Reference standard
Use an independent reference standard when one exists; document expert-adjudicated alternatives.
External validation required
Yes

Interpretation safeguards

Common misinterpretations

Treating pathway-level support as interchangeable with overall study quality, or interpreting a favorable value as proof that all other bias and validity domains are satisfactory.

Limitations

Depends on context, operational definition, thresholds, data quality, and evaluator judgment; it should not be used as a stand-alone summary score without domain-level evidence.

Dependency status

Not yet curated. Closely related metrics are represented; causal or computational dependencies require expert curation.

Source provenance

Source workbook
Pure_Biomedical_Evidence_Research_Metrics_Part_2(3).xlsx
Source worksheet
Biomedical Evidence Metrics
Source row
26
Source record SHA-256
a1a0e0a377d9f949a45a0ad0a040b0443e29f24bfe701f3b015420b52cd21ab2
Definition source
Pure_Biomedical_Evidence_Research_Metrics_Part_2(3).xlsx row 26; see source_references

Scientific references (5)

  1. https://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/Source framework, standard, guideline, or originSource-preserved; URL reachability not asserted by this package
  2. https://www.fda.gov/media/119271/downloadSource framework, standard, guideline, or originSource-preserved; URL reachability not asserted by this package
  3. https://clinicalgenome.org/curation-activities/gene-disease-validity/Source framework, standard, guideline, or originSource-preserved; URL reachability not asserted by this package
  4. https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/whatwestudy/assessments/noncancer/handbookSource framework, standard, guideline, or originSource-preserved; URL reachability not asserted by this package
  5. https://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/testing/oecd-guidelines-testing-chemicals-related-documents.htmSource framework, standard, guideline, or originSource-preserved; URL reachability not asserted by this package

Governance and FAIR status

Lifecycle
Candidate
Approval
Draft
Owner
BEMO Project
Curator
Unassigned
Reviewer
Unassigned
License
Pending owner approval; CC BY 4.0 recommended for OBO compatibility.
Findable
Provisional: stable local ID assigned; public namespace registration pending.
Accessible
Provisional: package is distributable; permanent public release location pending.
Interoperable
Yes: OWL 2, RDF, SKOS, SHACL, JSON-LD, CSV, and OBO-style identifiers.
Reusable
Provisional: rich metadata supplied; open-license owner approval pending.
Governance note
Candidate term pending scientific, ontology-engineering, and computation-method review.
Editor note
Source content preserved verbatim; computation metadata is a generated default and must be curated before normative use.