{"metric_id":"BEMO:2000156","metric_iri":"https://w3id.org/bemo/BEMO_2000156","preferred_label":"Evidence Triangulation Strength","normalized_label":"evidence_triangulation_strength","abbreviation":"","pillar_id":"BEMO:1000001","pillar_label":"Evidence Synthesis and Certainty","category_id":"BEMO:1100006","category_label":"Evidence Certainty and Synthesis","parent_class_iri":"https://w3id.org/bemo/BEMO_1100006","ontology_namespace":"BEMO","ontology_version":"0.1.0","metric_version":"1.0.0","lifecycle_status":"Candidate","deprecated":false,"replacement_id":"","created_date":"2026-08-02","modified_date":"2026-08-02","language":"en","license_status":"Pending owner approval; CC BY 4.0 recommended for OBO compatibility.","scientific_definition":"The magnitude and credibility of independent evidence supporting evidence triangulation.","what_it_measures":"Assesses evidence triangulation strength using evidence appropriate to evidence certainty and synthesis, distinguishing random uncertainty from systematic error.","why_it_matters":"Material weakness in evidence triangulation strength can change the direction, magnitude, certainty, or biological interpretation of the research conclusion.","measurement_criteria":"Prespecified operational definition; appropriate comparator or reference; quantified uncertainty; independent or orthogonal corroboration; sensitivity analyses.","methods_of_assessment":"Structured critical appraisal; quantitative estimation with uncertainty; prespecified thresholds; independent replication; sensitivity and subgroup analyses.","units_or_scale_source":"Ordinal rubric, domain judgment, or normalized score","evidence_level_source":"Body of evidence / synthesis / outcome","applicable_study_types_source":"Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, evidence profiles, guidelines","related_frameworks_source":"GRADE; PRISMA; AMSTAR 2; RoB","closely_related_metrics_source":"Evidence Robustness; Counterevidence Strength; Missing Evidence Risk","common_misinterpretations":"Treating evidence triangulation strength as interchangeable with overall study quality, or interpreting a favorable value as proof that all other bias and validity domains are satisfactory.","limitations":"Depends on context, operational definition, thresholds, data quality, and evaluator judgment; it should not be used as a stand-alone summary score without domain-level evidence.","scientific_importance":8,"frequency_of_use":"Common","maturity_of_metric":"Established","references_source":"https://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/ | https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020-checklist | https://www.bmj.com/content/358/bmj.j4008 | https://www.riskofbias.info/","metric_kind":"AtomicOrCompositeNotYetCurated","output_concept":"BEMO:0000200 Metric Assessment","scale_type":"OrdinalOrNormalizedScoreScale","output_datatype":"xsd:string_or_decimal","unit_ontology_iri":"","unit_text":"Ordinal rubric, domain judgment, or normalized score","minimum_value":null,"maximum_value":null,"null_value":null,"directionality":"ContextDependentDirection","computation_mode":"RuleBasedRubricComputation","computation_readiness":"RubricRequired","formula_status":"ContextSpecificProtocolRequired","human_readable_formula":"Apply a versioned, prespecified domain rubric or validated normalized scoring model.","machine_formula_language":"BEMO-Expression-JSON","machine_formula_expression":"{\"language\":\"BEMO-Expression-JSON\",\"operator\":\"external_protocol\",\"protocolRef\":\"REQUIRED\",\"allowed_outputs\":[\"ordinal_category\",\"normalized_score\"]}","required_inputs":"evidence_records; assessment_context; rubric_version; operational_definition","optional_inputs":"weights; thresholds; expert_adjudication","aggregation_rule":"Not specified in source; must be defined and versioned before composite use.","normalization_method":"None by default; any normalization must be justified, versioned, and validated.","missing_data_policy":"Must be declared before computation; report missingness; no silent imputation; perform sensitivity analysis when material.","uncertainty_required":true,"uncertainty_method":"Confidence interval, credible interval, bootstrap distribution, inter-rater reliability, or sensitivity analysis as scientifically applicable.","confidence_interval_required":false,"threshold_policy":"Prespecify, justify, version, and sensitivity-test thresholds; do not derive and evaluate on the same data without correction.","decision_thresholds":"","quality_control_requirements":"Source provenance; input validation; duplicate control; uncertainty reporting; independent or orthogonal validation where applicable.","calibration_requirement":"Required for normalized scores; inter-rater reliability required for human rubrics.","validation_status":"Source maturity: Established; BEMO computation profile requires independent validation.","benchmark_requirement":"A representative, versioned benchmark set is required before production use.","gold_standard_requirement":"Use an independent reference standard when one exists; document expert-adjudicated alternatives.","external_validation_required":true,"evidence_object_scope":"Body of evidence / synthesis / outcome","study_type_applicability":"Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, evidence profiles, guidelines","domain_applicability":"Evidence Certainty and Synthesis","required_data_sources":"Context-specific; use source references, registered studies, primary data, and authoritative biomedical resources as applicable.","computational_method_family":"structured critical appraisal or rubric scoring","software_implementation_status":"Specification generated; metric-specific reference implementation pending.","reference_implementation":"scripts/compute_metric.py --metric BEMO:2000156","api_endpoint_template":"/v1/metrics/BEMO:2000156/compute","json_schema_ref":"schemas/bemo-assessment.schema.json","shacl_shape_iri":"https://w3id.org/bemo/shapes/BEMO_2000156_AssessmentShape","provenance_model":"W3C PROV-O","source_workbook":"Pure_Biomedical_Evidence_Research_Metrics_Part_2(3).xlsx","source_sheet":"Biomedical Evidence Metrics","source_row":163,"source_record_hash":"b9d887ba211f3aea4699afd087a0aa12fb8ca924209ee34ccda2bfd968c02a4a","source_references":"https://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/ | https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020-checklist | https://www.bmj.com/content/358/bmj.j4008 | https://www.riskofbias.info/","curator":"Unassigned","reviewer":"Unassigned","owner":"BEMO Project","approval_status":"Draft","governance_note":"Candidate term pending scientific, ontology-engineering, and computation-method review.","editor_note":"Source content preserved verbatim; computation metadata is a generated default and must be curated before normative use.","definition_source":"Pure_Biomedical_Evidence_Research_Metrics_Part_2(3).xlsx row 163; see source_references","exact_synonyms":"","broad_synonyms":"","narrow_synonyms":"","related_synonyms":"","xrefs":"https://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/ | https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020-checklist | https://www.bmj.com/content/358/bmj.j4008 | https://www.riskofbias.info/","obo_subset":"bemo_evidence_synthesis_and_certainty","fair_findable":"Provisional: stable local ID assigned; public namespace registration pending.","fair_accessible":"Provisional: package is distributable; permanent public release location pending.","fair_interoperable":"Yes: OWL 2, RDF, SKOS, SHACL, JSON-LD, CSV, and OBO-style identifiers.","fair_reusable":"Provisional: rich metadata supplied; open-license owner approval pending.","confidence_in_metric_definition":"Not yet formally assessed","metric_dependency_status":"Not yet curated","dependency_notes":"Closely related metrics are represented; causal or computational dependencies require expert curation.","implementation_notes":"Exact execution requires a validated computation profile unless formula_status is GenericTemplateDefined.","test_case_status":"Generic validation template provided","example_input_ref":"examples/example_metric_input.json","example_output_ref":"examples/example_metric_output.jsonld","notes":"No source scientific statement was silently altered or replaced.","url_id":"BEMO-2000156","required_inputs_list":["evidence_records","assessment_context","rubric_version","operational_definition"],"optional_inputs_list":["weights","thresholds","expert_adjudication"],"source_record":{"source_workbook":"Pure_Biomedical_Evidence_Research_Metrics_Part_2(3).xlsx","source_sheet":"Biomedical Evidence Metrics","source_row":"163","Category":"Evidence Certainty and Synthesis","Metric":"Evidence Triangulation Strength","Scientific Definition":"The magnitude and credibility of independent evidence supporting evidence triangulation.","What It Measures":"Assesses evidence triangulation strength using evidence appropriate to evidence certainty and synthesis, distinguishing random uncertainty from systematic error.","Why It Matters":"Material weakness in evidence triangulation strength can change the direction, magnitude, certainty, or biological interpretation of the research conclusion.","Measurement Criteria":"Prespecified operational definition; appropriate comparator or reference; quantified uncertainty; independent or orthogonal corroboration; sensitivity analyses.","Typical Methods of Assessment":"Structured critical appraisal; quantitative estimation with uncertainty; prespecified thresholds; independent replication; sensitivity and subgroup analyses.","Units or Scale (if applicable)":"Ordinal rubric, domain judgment, or normalized score","Evidence Level Where Used":"Body of evidence / synthesis / outcome","Applicable Study Types":"Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, evidence profiles, guidelines","Related Frameworks":"GRADE; PRISMA; AMSTAR 2; RoB","Closely Related Metrics":"Evidence Robustness; Counterevidence Strength; Missing Evidence Risk","Common Misinterpretations":"Treating evidence triangulation strength as interchangeable with overall study quality, or interpreting a favorable value as proof that all other bias and validity domains are satisfactory.","Limitations":"Depends on context, operational definition, thresholds, data quality, and evaluator judgment; it should not be used as a stand-alone summary score without domain-level evidence.","Scientific Importance (1–10)":"8","Frequency of Use":"Common","Maturity of Metric":"Established","References or Origin":"https://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/ | https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020-checklist | https://www.bmj.com/content/358/bmj.j4008 | https://www.riskofbias.info/"},"computation_profile":{"metric_id":"BEMO:2000156","preferred_label":"Evidence Triangulation Strength","computation_mode":"RuleBasedRubricComputation","computation_readiness":"RubricRequired","formula_status":"ContextSpecificProtocolRequired","human_readable_formula":"Apply a versioned, prespecified domain rubric or validated normalized scoring model.","machine_formula_language":"BEMO-Expression-JSON","machine_formula_expression":{"language":"BEMO-Expression-JSON","operator":"external_protocol","protocolRef":"REQUIRED","allowed_outputs":["ordinal_category","normalized_score"]},"required_inputs":"evidence_records; assessment_context; rubric_version; operational_definition","optional_inputs":"weights; thresholds; expert_adjudication","output_concept":"BEMO:0000200 Metric Assessment","output_datatype":"xsd:string_or_decimal","scale_type":"OrdinalOrNormalizedScoreScale","unit_ontology_iri":"","unit_text":"Ordinal rubric, domain judgment, or normalized score","minimum_value":null,"maximum_value":null,"null_value":null,"directionality":"ContextDependentDirection","aggregation_rule":"Not specified in source; must be defined and versioned before composite use.","normalization_method":"None by default; any normalization must be justified, versioned, and validated.","missing_data_policy":"Must be declared before computation; report missingness; no silent imputation; perform sensitivity analysis when material.","uncertainty_required":true,"uncertainty_method":"Confidence interval, credible interval, bootstrap distribution, inter-rater reliability, or sensitivity analysis as scientifically applicable.","confidence_interval_required":false,"threshold_policy":"Prespecify, justify, version, and sensitivity-test thresholds; do not derive and evaluate on the same data without correction.","decision_thresholds":"","quality_control_requirements":"Source provenance; input validation; duplicate control; uncertainty reporting; independent or orthogonal validation where applicable.","calibration_requirement":"Required for normalized scores; inter-rater reliability required for human rubrics.","validation_status":"Source maturity: Established; BEMO computation profile requires independent validation.","benchmark_requirement":"A representative, versioned benchmark set is required before production use.","gold_standard_requirement":"Use an independent reference standard when one exists; document expert-adjudicated alternatives.","external_validation_required":true,"computational_method_family":"structured critical appraisal or rubric scoring","software_implementation_status":"Specification generated; metric-specific reference implementation pending.","reference_implementation":"scripts/compute_metric.py --metric BEMO:2000156","api_endpoint_template":"/v1/metrics/BEMO:2000156/compute","json_schema_ref":"schemas/bemo-assessment.schema.json","shacl_shape_iri":"https://w3id.org/bemo/shapes/BEMO_2000156_AssessmentShape","profile_version":"0.1.0","profile_iri":"https://w3id.org/bemo/profile/BEMO_2000156"},"relationships":[{"predicate":"closely_related_metric","source":"Source workbook: Closely Related Metrics","status":"SourceDeclared","directionality":"Directed as recorded; may be symmetric in the source","version":"0.1.0","metric_id":"BEMO:2000152","preferred_label":"Evidence Robustness"},{"predicate":"closely_related_metric","source":"Source workbook: Closely Related Metrics","status":"SourceDeclared","directionality":"Directed as recorded; may be symmetric in the source","version":"0.1.0","metric_id":"BEMO:2000140","preferred_label":"Counterevidence Strength"},{"predicate":"closely_related_metric","source":"Source workbook: Closely Related Metrics","status":"SourceDeclared","directionality":"Directed as recorded; may be symmetric in the source","version":"0.1.0","metric_id":"BEMO:2000158","preferred_label":"Missing Evidence Risk"}],"incoming_relationships":[{"predicate":"closely_related_metric","source":"Source workbook: Closely Related Metrics","status":"SourceDeclared","directionality":"Directed as recorded; may be symmetric in the source","version":"0.1.0","metric_id":"BEMO:2000140","preferred_label":"Counterevidence Strength"},{"predicate":"closely_related_metric","source":"Source workbook: Closely Related Metrics","status":"SourceDeclared","directionality":"Directed as recorded; may be symmetric in the source","version":"0.1.0","metric_id":"BEMO:2000149","preferred_label":"Evidence Freshness"},{"predicate":"closely_related_metric","source":"Source workbook: Closely Related Metrics","status":"SourceDeclared","directionality":"Directed as recorded; may be symmetric in the source","version":"0.1.0","metric_id":"BEMO:2000152","preferred_label":"Evidence Robustness"}],"references":[{"order":1,"url":"https://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/","type":"Source framework, standard, guideline, or origin","verification_status":"Source-preserved; URL reachability not asserted by this package"},{"order":2,"url":"https://www.prisma-statement.org/prisma-2020-checklist","type":"Source framework, standard, guideline, or origin","verification_status":"Source-preserved; URL reachability not asserted by this package"},{"order":3,"url":"https://www.bmj.com/content/358/bmj.j4008","type":"Source framework, standard, guideline, or origin","verification_status":"Source-preserved; URL reachability not asserted by this package"},{"order":4,"url":"https://www.riskofbias.info/","type":"Source framework, standard, guideline, or origin","verification_status":"Source-preserved; URL reachability not asserted by this package"}]}